History 1HI0/31 November 2020 | Edexcel GCSE Past Papers With Mark Scheme
Edexcel
GCSE
History (1HI0)
Nov
2020
2. 1924–1929 German recovery drivers: Stresemann’s diplomacy, Dawes Plan loans, economic stabilization via Rentenmark, reduced reparations, increased foreign investment, restored international confidence
3. Nazi support source analysis: Source B reflects external propaganda with idealized support, Source C offers internal testimony suggesting fear-driven compliance—utility determined by origin and purpose
4. Interpretations contrast: Interpretation 1 emphasizes widespread Nazi support and enthusiasm, Interpretation 2 stresses fear, coercion, and superficial loyalty—divergence rooted in historian focus and evidence selection
5. Support explanation for differing interpretations: based on time of writing, access to new evidence, source types used (official vs. personal), or historian bias and purpose
6. Evaluation of Interpretation 2: supported by repression accounts, Gestapo terror, lack of free elections, censorship, dissent suppression; challenged by rally attendance, Hitler youth participation, economic recovery appeal
معلم موافق رایگان بودن است.
1. Kristallnacht Jewish persecution indicators: violent arrests, property destruction, forced public humiliation, systemic targeting of Jewish community via registration and intimidation2. 1924–1929 German recovery drivers: Stresemann’s diplomacy, Dawes Plan loans, economic stabilization via Rentenmark, reduced reparations, increased foreign investment, restored international confidence
3. Nazi support source analysis: Source B reflects external propaganda with idealized support, Source C offers internal testimony suggesting fear-driven compliance—utility determined by origin and purpose
4. Interpretations contrast: Interpretation 1 emphasizes widespread Nazi support and enthusiasm, Interpretation 2 stresses fear, coercion, and superficial loyalty—divergence rooted in historian focus and evidence selection
5. Support explanation for differing interpretations: based on time of writing, access to new evidence, source types used (official vs. personal), or historian bias and purpose
6. Evaluation of Interpretation 2: supported by repression accounts, Gestapo terror, lack of free elections, censorship, dissent suppression; challenged by rally attendance, Hitler youth participation, economic recovery appeal

پیش نمایش صفحه اول فایل
تعداد صفحات فایل : 20
باز نشر محتواها در فضای مجازی، ممنوع است.